1493

Doctrine of Discovery 

1598

Spanish Settlement in New Mexico

1821

Mexican Independence

1830

Indian Removal Act

1849

Treaty of Abiqui

1858-59

Pikes Peak Gold Rush

1861

Uintah Reservation Established

1862

Homestead Act

1868

Ute Treaty of 1868

1873

Brunot Agreement

1879-80

Milk Creek to Forced Removal

1887

Dawes Act

1908

Winters Doctrine

1924

Indian Citizenship Act

1934

Indian Reorganization Act

1977

Ute Comanche Peace Treaty

1978

Indian Religious Freedom Act

Today

The Ute People Are Still Here

Please wait while you are redirected...or Click Here if you do not want to wait.

1868 Ute Treaty

Prior to 1868, Ute aboriginal territory in Colorado encompassed 56 million acres. After the treaty of 1868, Ute lands were reduced to 18 million acres. Under the terms of the 1868 Treaty with the Utes, two agencies were established. The northern agency was established on the White River to serve the Yampa, Grand River, and Uintah bands, while the southern agency was established on Los Pinos Creek in the Cochetopa Hills to serve the Tabeguache, Mouache, Weenuche, and Kapuuta  bands. (© and Courtesy of Ute Ethnographic and Ethnobotanical Research in the Bonita Peak Mining District, in-text citations removed) 

In preparation of the treaty in 1868, a delegation of Ute leaders travelled to Washington D.C. along with Colorado Territorial Governor Alexander Hunt, as well as Kit Carson, and Lafayette Head, who were both serving as Indian Agents in the Colorado Territory. The federal government created a reservation encompassing nearly 16.5 million acres or roughly the western third of the territory. In return, the agencies at White River and Los Pinos would distribute annuities including food, tools, supplies, farming equipment, and farm animals for each family.

According to the Treaty of 1868, settlers, miners, and non-Native people could not enter, live on, or travel through the reservation. While many Ute leaders purportedly signed the treaty, some signatures were later disputed. Most significantly, many Ute leaders resented Ouray for not only signing the Treaty of 1868, but for agreeing with the U.S. Government’s desire for him to, “Speak on behalf of all Utes as their Chief.” This type of singular leadership went against traditional Ute practices, but nevertheless federal and state authorities preferred willful ignorance of Native beliefs, values, and traditions for the sake of expediency.